FXPIG Review | Is FXPIG Legit or a Scam? Regulation, Trading Conditions & User Feedback
Summary:How is FXPIG? FXPIG was previously regulated by the Vanuatu VFSC, but its license has been revoked and it currently lacks effective oversight. The platform offers MT4/MT5/cTrader/FIX APIs, supports high leverage up to 1:500, and covers over 300 instruments, including forex, indices, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. User reviews are mixed, and there are concerns about withdrawal issues and regulatory risks. With an overall rating of approximately 4.3/10, caution is advised. Average investors are more suitable for platforms regulated by major regulatory bodies such as the FCA and ASIC.

Website : fxpig.com
I. Detailed explanation of regulatory compliance status
VFSC regulatory record : FXPIG historically claimed to be regulated by the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC), with license number 14578. However, according to WikiFX's latest platform report, this regulatory status is now " Revoked ." This indicates that the license has not been renewed or has expired, which is a serious regulatory deficiency. ([turn0search0])
Industry Regulatory Rating : Traders Union , for example, lists it as a " Tier-3 (lowest level of regulation) platform ," meaning it has virtually no legal protection and minimal oversight. ([turn0search15])
Lack of transparency : The official website's regulatory page does not contain any actual regulatory links or documents. It is for display purposes only and does not include a valid regulatory authorization letter or link verification method.
II. Insights into Products and Trading Tools
Wide range of products : Over 300 financial instruments , including mainstream and niche forex pairs, European, American and Asian indices, energy, precious metals, stock CFDs and cryptocurrencies (trading 24/7).
The T&Cs and contract details are opaque : The relevant pages do not disclose standard information such as contract size, minimum spread, and swap rate, and require customer service or account verification to obtain. There is a lack of official transparency.
Trading Mechanism : Claims 100% STP (Straight Through Execution) with no trader intervention. However, the lack of a third-party audit report on execution quality makes it difficult to verify slippage or order rejection rates.
3. Account Types and Fee Structure
| Account Type | Starting point for deposit | lever | Pricing Model | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | USD 200 | Up to 1:500 | Flat spread + commission | Slightly higher fees, but faster execution |
| Premiere | USD 5,000 | Up to 1:500 | Direct access to ECN Raw spreads | Professional account, low slippage, fast speed |
| Pro | USD 50k | Up to 1:500 | Customized quote structure | Only for large investors, application required |
The leverage is at the highest level (1:500), but this also means that the risk is doubled.
There is no standard framework for displaying commissions and spreads, making comparison difficult.
No Negative Balance Protection (NBP) or Fund Compensation Fund is available.
4. Trading Platform and Technical Services
Strong platform coverage : supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, and FIX API , meeting the needs of retail to high-frequency/quantitative trading.
Reliability issues : Multiple FAQs and user feedback indicate that MT5 frequently loses connection, is unable to log in to account migration, and has low stability on the mobile version .
Market delays and slippage : Users reported significant slippage during certain periods, especially during news hours, where MT4 order execution was inconsistent with quotes.
V. Deposit and Withdrawal Policy and Fund Security
Deposit methods : Bank cards, wire transfers, Skrill, Neteller, etc. are supported, but the official website lacks a clear table of channel fees/limits.
Withdrawal processing : Users complained about slow withdrawal times (ranging from 1 to 7 business days), and occasionally had issues with "additional verification being requested."
High risk of fund security : There is no regulatory protection, no public statement of fund isolation mechanism, and user funds are exposed to risks.
6. User word-of-mouth feedback
Trustpilot's overall rating is 3.2/5 : Some people say the customer service is fast and the execution is quick; there are also a large number of complaints about withdrawals not being credited and accounts being restricted.
Numerous user comments on ForexPeaceArmy , such as "I deposited $500 once, but my withdrawal request was constantly delayed," or "Customer service evaded and refused to respond," warn of serious risks. ([turn0search1])
** “Withdrawal prohibited” and “account frozen” alerts frequently appear in anonymous social networks and Telegram groups).
VII. Overview of Third-Party Security Ratings
BrokerChooser's safety rating : FXPIG is listed as an "unsafe platform," and investors are explicitly warned to avoid it , citing "lack of regulation and compliance." ([turn0search3])
Other risk warnings : Some financial regulatory agencies or investment forums have listed it on the "high-risk platform" list, reminding investors to exercise extreme caution.
8. Overall score and investment advice (0–10)
Regulatory safety: 1/10 — Loss of regulation, no compensation mechanism, extremely high risk.
Platform & Execution: 6/10 — Comprehensive tools, but stability and execution quality are issues.
Product Range: 8/10 — Comprehensive coverage and a wide range of strategies.
Cost Transparency: 5/10 — Lack of public data and unclear costs.
Customer Support Experience: 4/10 — Some responses were quick, but withdrawal issues were frequent.
Fund Security: 2/10 — No fund segregation or insurance, extremely unsafe.
Overall Score: 4.3/10 — Trading conditions are acceptable, but the platform's background and regulatory framework are seriously insufficient. This platform is only recommended for those with a high risk appetite for short-term use and is not suitable for conservative investors in the long term.

IX. Summary and Risk Warning
FXPIG's multi-platform technology and product coverage are attractive, but its unstable regulatory status, lack of fund protection, and frequent user complaints make it a highly risky platform . We strongly recommend that ordinary investors choose platforms regulated by major regulators such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC to ensure fund security and fair trading.
⚠️Risk Warning and Disclaimer
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information from the public internet or user-uploaded content. BrokerHivex does not support any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.

