

Summary:A complete analysis of regulatory truths, withdrawal risks, and compliance verification (including quantitative scoring)
High regulatory risk : The UK's FCA has designated triumphfx.net as an "unauthorized firm" and explicitly warned the public not to trade with it. ( FCA )
Warnings issued in multiple locations : The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has listed Triumph Global (Asia) / TFX Global / tfxi.com as unlicensed companies or suspicious websites ; the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has also issued warnings on its Investor Alert List. The Securities Commission of Malaysia (SC) has also issued warnings on its Investor Alert List. ( Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission , Monetary Authority of Singapore , SC )
Cyprus regulatory actions : CySEC repeatedly suspended voting rights for its shareholders until it was removed from investor warning lists in Singapore and Malaysia, demonstrating the severity and persistence of its compliance disputes. ( FX News Group )
Numerous withdrawal and currency conversion complaints : Users reported forced conversions of their assets from USDT to the platform's native TFX token without their consent, resulting in subsequent withdrawal difficulties and opaque valuations. ( Trustpilot )
Conclusion : TriumphFX has typical high-risk/suspected scam characteristics: cross-domain "cloning/mixing names", unlicensed or suspicious websites, long-term presence on warning lists in multiple regions, and concentrated complaints about fund deposits and withdrawals.
There are many different names for TriumphFX, TFXI, Triumph Int. (Cyprus) Ltd, Triumph Global (Asia) Limited, tfxi.com, triumphfx.net , etc. This kind of name/domain name jigsaw puzzle can easily give investors the illusion that the company is regulated.
The UK's FCA has directly named triumphfx.net as an unauthorized entity and warned the public to stay away. This page is a link to the FCA's official website, which can be verified at any time. ( FCA )
The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has listed Triumph Global (Asia) / TFX Global and its websites (including tfxi.com ) on its "Warning List" and labeled them " unlicensed companies ." ( SFC )
The Singapore MAS "Investor Alert List" can be searched for TriumphFX / Triumph Int. Limited related entries. ( Monetary Authority of Singapore )
Investor Takeaway : When a brand is listed as unlicensed/warning in multiple jurisdictions and operates under similar names and multiple domain names , it is a very obvious **red flag** signal.
United Kingdom (FCA)
A clear warning : "triumphfx.net" is unauthorized and may be soliciting business in the UK. The page includes guidance on "How to Protect Yourself" and "Reporting Unlicensed Firms." ( FCA )
The FCA also maintains a warning list of unauthorised firms and highlights the use of "clone firms". ( FCA )
Hong Kong (SFC)
Unlicensed entity/suspicious website : Listed as Triumph Global (Asia) Limited / TFX Global , with a website containing tfxi.com . The note states that the entity is not based in Hong Kong , but uses a Hong Kong address for misleading purposes. ( Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission )
Singapore (MAS)
Investor Alert List : Searchable alerts related to TriumphFX / Triumph Int., intended to alert the public to the risks of mistaking a firm for one that is licensed . ( Monetary Authority of Singapore )
Malaysia (SC)
Investor Alert List : An official, long-term list of unlicensed/warning entities, urging investors not to trade with those listed. ( SC )
Cyprus (CySEC)
Regulatory Actions : CySEC has repeatedly suspended voting rights for TriumphFX and related company shareholders , clarifying that these restrictions will remain in place until TriumphFX is removed from its warning lists in Singapore and Malaysia. This suggests regulatory concerns about its compliance are not short-term . ( FX News Group )
Comprehensive interpretation : Simultaneous warnings/actions from regulators in multiple countries are the most direct high-risk signals to investors.
Market data shows that TriumphFX's common external narratives include: stable monthly returns, fund custody , profit sharing/PAMM , etc.; such rhetoric is disconnected from regulatory approvals and underlying risk control/liquidity information.
Mainstream media review articles indicate that the company's " red flag " history dates back to 2015 , indicating that the problem has persisted for many years . ( Finance Magnates )
Once a platform converts user assets from fiat currency/USDT to its own tokens or opaque assets, valuation and withdrawal risks increase dramatically. Trustpilot has numerous similar complaints. ( Trustpilot )
Deposit channels : usually support cryptocurrencies (USDT/Bitcoin) and some electronic payments;
Withdrawal pain points :
Withdrawal cycle is extremely long/not processed ;
The account assets were converted to platform tokens (TFX) without the user's consent , resulting in the valuation/liquidity being unilaterally controlled by the platform, making it difficult for users to exit in a timely manner ;
Complaints are most common after market fluctuations or when users profit . ( Trustpilot )
Lack of core compliance indicators such as liquidity providers , hedging mechanisms , transaction slippage statistics , authentic regulatory numbers , and audit reports ;
Disclosure of best quote/execution and segregation of client funds is severely inadequate compared to regulated CFD firms (e.g. those subject to the MiFID framework in the UK/EU).
Regulatory differences : Legitimate brokerages will clearly indicate the regulatory number , license holder name , complaint channels , and compensation mechanism (FSCS/ICF, etc.) on their website homepage/disclosure page ;
Business boundaries : Legitimate brokerages will not change the form of client assets without consent ;
Sales compliance : Sales materials from formal brokerage firms must pass compliance review and are not allowed to promise principal protection/fixed high returns .
Scoring principles : Based on nine dimensions: "regulatory compliance", "fund security", "information transparency", "execution quality", "cost pricing", "sales compliance", "reputation and complaints", "customer service and education", "survival and sustainability".
The weights are ranked by their impact on investors' actual risk (total 100%). Each item is given a score (0-10) and a brief rationale .
Regulatory compliance (25% weight) — 1/10
Regulatory warnings/unlicensed in multiple countries (FCA/SFC/MAS/SC), and a suspension of equity voting rights by CySEC. ( FCA , Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission , Monetary Authority of Singapore , SC , FX News Group )
Fund security (20% weight) — 1/10
Frequent complaints of difficulty in currency conversion/withdrawal , and a lack of customer fund isolation and compensation mechanisms . ( Trustpilot )
Information transparency (10% weight) — 2/10
Insufficient disclosure of liquidity, auditing, regulatory numbers, and hedging/risk control; mixed use of domain names/names increases identification difficulties . ( Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission )
Execution quality (10% weight) — 2/10
In parallel with the "currency change" and "withdrawal restrictions", the real transaction/slippage indicators are not disclosed and their reliability is questionable.
Cost-based pricing (8% weighting) — 4/10
The spreads/fees are claimed to be attractive, but without a compliance framework and low transparency , the price promise lacks verifiability .
Sales compliance (weight 10%) — 1/10
Narratives such as "stable monthlyization" and "profit sharing custody" contradict regulatory warnings about the high risks of CFDs and are highly misleading . ( Finance and Business News | Finance Magnates )
Reputation and complaints (7%) — 2/10
A large number of negative experiences: currency changes, freezes, delayed withdrawals , etc. ( Trustpilot )
Customer Service and Education (5% weighting) — 3/10
Customer service response is slow, education/research is almost non-existent, and risk warning and investor education requirements cannot be met.
Survival and sustainability (5% weighting) — 3/10
Since 2015, there have been persistent negative regulatory and media reports and actions , raising long-term regulatory uncertainty . ( Finance Magnates )
Overall score (weighted) ≈ 2.1 / 10 (rounded to 2.1)
Comment: Extremely high risk . Warnings and actions from multiple regulatory jurisdictions, backed by user complaints , suggest a high risk of losing funds at any time .
Multiple domain names/names can easily be confused with legitimate licensed entities ; ( Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission )
Named by authoritative regulators such as FCA / SFC / MAS / SC ; ( FCA , Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission , Monetary Authority of Singapore , SC )
Currency changes/own tokens , withdrawal delays and throttling; ( Trustpilot )
Zero disclosure of key security indicators such as fund isolation, liquidity, and auditing ;
Sales pitches promising "stable returns/low risk" conflict with regulations . ( Finance Magnates )
Save evidence immediately : deposit receipt, chat history, account flow, backend screenshots and KYC materials;
Report the case to the regulator/police in your country: For the UK, refer to the FCA's "Reporting Unlicensed Firms" guide; for Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, refer to their respective official reporting and complaint channels ( FCA , SC ).
Contact the card issuing bank/payer to try to refuse/stop payment;
Do not make additional investments or transfer to "affiliated platforms";
Consult professional lawyers/compliance consultants to assess the feasibility and cost-benefit of cross-border recovery.
First check the license : Go to the official website of FCA/MAS/SFC/SC to verify whether the company name + number + address are consistent; ( FCA , Monetary Authority of Singapore , Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission , SC )
Rejecting "guaranteed principal/fixed monthly payments" : This runs counter to the logic of compliant CFD regulation. ( Finance and Business News | Finance Magnates )
Only use regulated, real brokers : requiring segregation of client funds , compensation mechanisms , and independent audits .
Combining regulatory lists/actions in various regions, ongoing media coverage , and user withdrawal/token conversion evidence, TriumphFX presents a highly consistent risk profile :
The compliance foundation is weak and the disclosure of core information is missing ;
There are significant uncertainties regarding sales and cash flows ;
Once investors deposit money, the cost of withdrawing it is high, the cycle is long, and the success rate is low .
It is recommended to stay away.
UK FCA's unauthorized warning about triumphfx.net : https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/triumphfxnet (Official page) ( FCA )
Hong Kong SFC Unlicensed/Suspicious List (including tfxi.com): https://www.sfc.hk/en/alert-list/1430 (Official page) ( Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission )
Singapore MAS Investor Alert List (search for TriumphFX): https://www.mas.gov.sg/investor-alert-list (Official page) ( Monetary Authority of Singapore )
Malaysia SC Investor Alert List: https://www.sc.com.my/investor-alert-list (Official page) ( SC )
CySEC-related actions (FXNewsGroup report 1): https://fxnewsgroup.com/forex-news/retail-forex/voting-rights-of-triumphfx-shareholder-chong-chun-hseung-suspended-by-cysec/ (Media Coverage) ( FX News Group )
CySEC-related actions (FXNewsGroup report 2): https://fxnewsgroup.com/forex-news/regulatory/triumphfx-shinetrades-shareholder-chong-chun-hseung-has-voting-rights-suspension-extended-by-cysec/ (Media coverage) ( FX News Group )
A roundup of historical red flags (Finance Magnates): https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/triumphfxs-ignored-red-flags-troubles-date-back-to-2015/ (Media Coverage) ( Financial and Business News | Finance Magnates )
User reviews/withdrawal complaints (Trustpilot): https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/tfxi.com (Third-party reviews) ( Trustpilot )
Company Name:Triumph Int. Limited
Website:
https://triumphfx.net/
2.08
Business Rating
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information sourced from the public internet or uploaded by users. BrokerHivex does not endorse any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.