

Summary:This article takes a deep dive into IronFX's regulatory status, historical controversies, user complaints, and fund security, exploring why, despite appearing legitimate on some rating platforms, it actually engages in a variety of high-risk, potentially fraudulent practices.
Company Founded : IronFX was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus. Its founder is Markos A. Kashiouris ( Wikipedia ).
Official regulatory information disclosed : Its subsidiaries have claimed to hold FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), ASIC (Australia), and FSB (South Africa) licenses ( Wikipedia , Spanish Wikipedia ).
Background of the controversy : Despite holding multiple licenses, IronFX has been frequently exposed to violations and complaints over the years, fined by CySEC, and listed as a "red card" broker by rating platforms such as FPA ( Financial Mirror , leaprate.com , Financial Pioneer , and Forex Peace Army ).
2015 : IronFX was fined €335,000 by CySEC, the second-highest fine on record at the time. The penalty was primarily for violations of segregation, risk management, and corporate governance regulations ( Financial Mirror , leaprate.com , Financial Pioneer ).
Public doubts : The outside world criticized that this amount is far from enough to compensate customers for their losses. CySEC also pointed out that the fine is not an admission of error, but part of the regulatory measures ( Financial Pioneer ).
Forex Peace Army (FPA) : IronFX has been blacklisted, with investors reporting widespread complaints of withdrawal denials and fraud ( Forex Peace Army , BabyPips.com Forum ).
The European Parliament has received multiple complaints alleging that IronFX has refused to process withdrawal requests for years, that complaints have been fruitless, and that regulatory oversight has been slow, alleging that its operations harm investor interests ( European Parliament ).
Many users reported being denied withdrawals, having their accounts frozen, or receiving unanswered emails after making profits.
Customer service was largely ineffective, and support channels were unable to assist with withdrawing funds.
There are many "big scam" and "scam warning" discussions on FPA and similar forums ( Forex Peace Army , forexfactory.com ).
Although it claims to be regulated in multiple places, in reality, after 2015, supervision was limited to CySEC, and the FCA allowed changes at will, lacking sufficient transparency.
The company split up its operations into multiple entities and used different licenses to confuse investors. In particular, it emphasized "multiple supervisions" in advertising, but the actual management was weak.
"IronFx has been listed as a scam by the FPA. Withdrawals are often blocked, and customer service is unresponsive."
“CySEC fined €335K, but investors still don’t get their money back.”
The above comments come from FPA and Trader communities, and reflect real user experiences ( Forex Peace Army , BabyPips.com Forum ).
Dimensions | Weight | Score (0–10) | Reasons |
---|---|---|---|
Regulatory compliance | 25% | 2 | It has a history of licensing, but frequent violations and penalties have led to low regulatory trust; CySEC fines have significantly affected its authority. |
Fund security | 20% | 2 | There have been numerous cases of withdrawal obstruction in history; customer service support is poor and fund isolation is questionable. |
Information transparency | 10% | 3 | License information is confusing and regulatory changes are not disclosed in a timely manner, which can easily lead to misleading trust. |
Execution quality | 10% | 3 | There are no public transaction reports; users frequently complain about slippage and freezing cases. |
Cost Pricing | 5% | 4 | Attractive spreads are advertised but unverified; may include hidden fees. |
Sales Compliance | 10% | 2 | The advertisements contain misleading elements such as "more supervision" and "guaranteed capital and stable returns". |
User reputation | 10% | 2 | Complaints are concentrated about the difficulty of withdrawing cash, and the online reviews are extremely poor. |
Customer Service and Education | 5% | 3 | There is educational content, but the customer service is extremely inefficient and the response to complaints is poor. |
Sustainability | 5% | 3 | Despite years of operating experience, continuous regulatory penalties and negative exposure will affect future credibility. |
Total score | — | 2.6/10 | — |
Comprehensive assessment : extremely high risk, investors should be extremely cautious .
There have been long-term complaints , and difficulty in withdrawing cash is the main contradiction.
Regulatory penalties are severe , but there has never been an effective financial compensation mechanism.
Information disclosure is not transparent , which confuses investors' judgment.
There is a lack of customer protection and no FSCS/FSCA type compensation path.
Negative communities and media continue to expose this , and the empirical risk is high.
Immediately preserve evidence (chat screenshots, transaction records, emails).
Apply for withdrawal first and save the response screenshot.
Complain to regulatory authorities : such as CySEC, FCA, ASIC; seek Ombudsman or legal recourse.
Consult the payment channel or bank to try to stop payment or recover the funds.
Prevent additional investment to avoid falling into deeper risks.
While IronFX was once nominally a platform "regulated by multiple regulators globally," its frequent violations, regulatory penalties, withdrawal disputes, and customer complaints have undermined its credibility. We believe that regardless of its positive ratings, IronFX is a high-risk platform with clear potential for scams .
CySEC fines IronFX €335,000 (2015): https://www.financialmirror.com/2015/11/27/cyprus-ironfx-faces-record-fine-settles-a335000-in-cash/ ( Financial Mirror )
Overview of the CySEC and IronFX Settlement (LeapRate): https://www.leaprate.com/news/cysec-settles-with-ironfx-imposes-fines-on-fxgm-eztrader-interactive-option-ufx-and-others/ ( leaprate.com )
Reasons for the CySEC Penalty and Interview with the Regulator (Finance Magnates): https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/cysec-head-ironfx-failed-identify-misuse-bonus-system/ ( Financial Pioneer )
The FPA community lists it as a scam and has many withdrawal complaints: https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/forex-reviews/7653/ironfx-forex-brokers ( Forex Peace Army )
Complaint summary from the investor forum: https://forums.babypips.com/t/ironfx-is-a-total-scam/1293141 ( BabyPips.com Forum )
Description of the European Parliament petition: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-CM-602856_EN.pdf ( European Parliament )
Regulation and background information on Wikipedia: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/IronFX , https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/IronFX ( Wikipedia , Spanish Wikipedia )
Company Name:IronFX Global Limited
Website:
https://www.ironfx.com
4.42
Business Rating
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information sourced from the public internet or uploaded by users. BrokerHivex does not endorse any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.