

Summary:GQFX (official website: https://gqfx.com) has been flagged as suspicious by multiple third-party platforms, with frequent user complaints regarding failed withdrawals, unidentified funds, and account delisting. This article provides a comprehensive assessment of fund flows, technical risk management, regional market strategies, and legal challenges, highlighting potential scam risks.
GQFX claims to be operated by GQ Capital Inc / GQ Capital Markets Ltd and claims to hold Belize FSC and Bahamas SCB licenses.
In a 2025 report, WikiFX News described GQFX as an "unregulated broker," with extremely low ratings and high risks. ( WikiFX )
WikiBit lists its pros and cons on its website, with "Not regulated" and "Limited information on commissions and fees" listed as disadvantages. ( WikiBit )
WikiFX brokerage pages often display the "Suspected Clone" label in the regulatory section, and many users complain about withdrawal and customer service issues. ( WikiFX )
Undisclosed custodian bank : The official website does not provide any information on where customer funds are stored.
Funds collection risk : There is suspicion among third parties that it transfers client funds to offshore accounts without any isolation measures.
Lack of audit : Compliant brokerages will regularly publish financial audit reports, but GQFX does not have any.
In addition to the financial issues, GQFX has also been widely questioned regarding its platform execution:
Serious transaction delays and slippage
Users often experience delays when placing orders during periods of high volatility, resulting in slippage losses. ( WikiBit complaint )
Suspected backstage manipulation
Investors said that when their positions were profitable, they were suddenly forced to close their positions and the prices were inconsistent with the market conditions.
System downtime
There are cases where transactions are disconnected midway, or even where login is impossible, resulting in missed trading opportunities.
GQFX's main promotional markets are Southeast Asia and Africa :
Reason : These regions have weaker regulations and investors have little awareness of compliance.
Problem : There is a lack of effective financial complaint channels in the local area, and it is extremely difficult to protect rights once a problem occurs.
Comparison : In Europe, Australia and other places, GQFX does not have a valid license and therefore cannot operate in compliance with regulations.
A large number of complaints show that investors face huge obstacles in protecting their rights:
Customer service shirking responsibility : Users reported that customer service only gave template responses and did not actually solve the problem.
Complex jurisdiction : Registered in Belize or the Bahamas, it is difficult for local investors to pursue accountability.
Lack of compensation mechanism : There is no investor compensation fund like the FCA and ASIC.
Class action lawsuits are difficult : Users have attempted to form groups to defend their rights by posting on WikiFX and TradersUnion, but fund recovery cases are rare.
Dimensions | Compliance platforms (such as FCA/ASIC) | GQFX Actual Condition |
---|---|---|
Fund Custody | Separate bank accounts, regular audits | The custodian bank is not disclosed and the whereabouts of the funds are unknown |
Technical Execution | Transparent slippage policy, stable platform | Complaints about frequent slippage, downtime, and backend manipulation |
Regulatory authenticity | Publicly available valid license | "Suspected clone", not verified in official database |
Regional Strategy | Strictly regulated areas as key markets | Focusing on Southeast Asia/Africa, lack of supervision |
Customer Protection | Arbitration channels + compensation funds | Without regulatory support, rights protection is basically fruitless |
Compliance: 1/10 — License plate appears to be cloned and regulatory identity cannot be verified.
Fund Security: 1/10 — Funds are not traceable and lack segregation and custody.
Technical Execution: 2/10 — Complaints focused on slippage and downtime.
Transparency: 2/10 — Insufficient company disclosure, no audit, no custody statement.
Market Reputation: 1/10 — WikiFX has a rating of 1.35/10, with numerous user complaints.
➡️ ⚠️ Overall Risk Score: 1/10 – Extremely high risk, avoid investing
Q1: Is GQFX really regulated?
A1: Third-party platforms are all labeled as “unregulated” or “suspected clones” and lack official verification.
Q2: Are the funds safe?
A2: There is no custodial bank information, no isolation measures, and the security of funds is extremely low.
Q3: Why is it mainly promoted in Southeast Asia and Africa?
A3: These regions have loose regulations and investors lack risk awareness, making them easily attracted.
Q4: What should I do if a withdrawal fails?
A4: You should immediately preserve evidence, contact the payment channel to attempt a chargeback, and file a complaint with local regulators or the police.
Q5: Can funds be recovered through collective rights protection?
A5: Some users have tried, but the success rate is low. Most fund recovery attempts fail.
GQFX (official website: https://gqfx.com) faces serious issues with unclear capital flows, system instability, regional strategy risks, and difficulties in protecting rights. With an overall risk score of only 1/10, investment is strongly discouraged.
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information sourced from the public internet or uploaded by users. BrokerHivex does not endorse any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.