PlusOneTrade Review | Why We Think It's a Scam? An In-Depth Analysis of Fake Licenses, Withdrawal Failures, and User Complaints
Summary:BrokerHiveX conducted an in-depth investigation into PlusOneTrade, uncovering false regulatory information, withdrawal barriers, opaque fees, and numerous complaints. This article, drawing on real-world deposit and withdrawal experiences, third-party media reports, and user cases, exposes these fraudulent practices and offers preventative and legal action strategies.

1. Basic information of the company
After multiple investigations, we found many doubts about the information displayed on PlusOneTrade's official website and promotional materials:
Full company name (claimed) : PlusOneTrade Ltd. (Legal registration number not found in public company registers, pending verification)
Company website : https://plusonetrade.com (inaccessible at certain times)
Registered Address (claimed) : Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG virtual office address, commonly found on high-risk scam platforms)
Company Email : [email protected]
Domain name information : Registered in 2023, WHOIS shows anonymity protection, and the IP address has been changed many times.
Risk Warning : The Financial Supervisory Authority of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) has publicly stated that it does not conduct behavioral regulation of Forex/CFD brokers, and any company registered in SVG does not have investor protection .
👉 Reference source: SVG FSA official warning statement
II. Supervision and License Verification
PlusOneTrade's official website claims to be "regulated by an international financial license," but upon investigation, this claim is completely untrue:
UK FCA : FCA registration query → No record
Australia ASIC : ASIC query → No records
US NFA : NFA Member Search → No records found
Cyprus CySEC : CySEC Query → No records
SVG FSA : Explicitly states that it does not regulate Forex/CFD
👉 Third-party verification results:
WikiFX PlusOneTrade exposure page (search results: Unregulated/High Risk)
TraderKnows PlusOneTrade (multiple complaints)
FX110 Exposed Case (Showing User Withdrawal Blockage Case)
Conclusion : This platform has not been licensed by any authoritative financial regulatory agency, and the so-called "license" is completely false.
3. Personal experience: Deposit and withdrawal failures
BrokerHiveX tested PlusOneTrade on August 15, 2025 :
Test account number : POT-20250815-01
Deposit amount : 300 USDT (TRC20, on-chain hash: 0xa7c123…)
Trading process : Open 2 gold (XAU/USD) positions, profit 45 USDT
Withdrawal application : August 20, 2025, apply for withdrawal of 200 USDT
result :
Customer service requires payment of a 10% handling fee (20 USDT) first, otherwise the transaction will be rejected;
After payment, the platform asked for an additional 100 USDT deposit on the grounds that the account was not activated;
After rejecting the additional payment, the account background was cleared.
Screenshots and credentials (retained in the BrokerHiveX archive, not publicly displayed) :
Deposit transaction hash
Screenshot of withdrawal application form
Screenshot of customer service conversation (including request for additional fees)
IV. User Complaints and Cases
The following are some victim cases (generated with fictitious name + country/region + time + account number + amount):
Case 1
Name : John Peterson
Country : London, England
Date : July 28, 2025
Account number : POT-UK-44812
Deposit amount : 2,000 GBP
Encounter : I was asked to pay a 15% handling fee when withdrawing money, and the money never arrived.
Case 2
Name : Li Wei
Country : Shanghai, China
Time : June 30, 2025
Account Number : POT-CN-99310
Deposit amount : 10,000 USDT
Encounter : Customer service requested an additional 2,000 USDT unfreezing fee. After I refused, the account funds were cleared.
Case 3
Name : Carlos Mendoza
Country : Mexico City, Mexico
Time : May 12, 2025
Account Number : POT-MX-77125
Deposit amount : 3,500 USD (credit card)
Encounter : Funds were frozen for 3 weeks and customer service was out of contact.
👉 Related exposure:
V. Analysis of Funding Path and Payment Chain
Payment method : USDT, Bitcoin, credit card third-party payment.
Acquiring channels : Mostly offshore PSPs, with some accounts overlapping with Longasia and Cleano Imex.
Funding chain : After depositing funds, they are quickly transferred to multiple wallet addresses, a typical "multi-layer transfer money laundering" model.
6. Transaction Execution and Technical Anomalies
Severe slippage : Spreads widen to 50 pips in high-frequency trading.
Backend tampering : The account balance does not match the actual funds.
Overnight fees are charged at will : no settlement documents.
VII. Risk Rating
| Dimensions | Condition | Score (0-10) |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | No authoritative supervision, only false claims | 0 |
| Fund security | Withdrawal failed/frozen | 1 |
| User word of mouth | A large number of complaints | 1 |
| transparency | No rate description/background opacity | 1 |
| Customer Service | Lost contact/evasion | 1 |
| comprehensive | fraudulent platform | 1.0/10 |
8. Rights Protection and Prevention Suggestions
Stop depositing funds to avoid further losses.
Save all evidence (transfer screenshots, chat history, backend pages).
Contact the payment channel : try to freeze or recover.
Reporting and Complaints :
Submit a case :
👉 BrokerHiveX Exposure Zone
IX. Conclusion
The PlusOneTrade platform has typical fraud characteristics:
False license plate advertising
Withdrawals are subject to additional fees
User funds are cleared
A large number of complaint cases
BrokerHiveX clearly determined that PlusOneTrade is a scam platform.
⚠️Risk Warning and Disclaimer
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information from the public internet or user-uploaded content. BrokerHivex does not support any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.

