Dicestradex Scam Review | Why dicestradex.com Is a Fraud: Fake License, Withdrawal Scam & Manipulation Evidence
Summary:Dicestradex claims to be regulated, but no regulatory filings have been found. They use false compliance information to lure investors into depositing funds, then lock their positions and refuse to pay them out. They then plunder funds through backend manipulation and secondary fees. This article exposes their complete fraudulent operation from multiple perspectives, including regulatory, field testing, and user complaints.

1. Platform Background and Suspicious Points: A Carefully Packaged "Shell Company"
Platform Name : Dicestrade
Official website : https://dicestradex.com
Declared place of registration : Canary Wharf, London, UK
External Email : [email protected]
Main business : foreign exchange, stocks, indices, cryptocurrency CFD
Claimed advantages : Low spreads, high leverage, AI strategies, professional analysis team, 24/7 customer support
On the surface, Dicestrade possesses all the hallmarks of a "compliant forex broker": a polished website, professional terminology, account managers, VIP investment advisors... However, a deeper dive into its background reveals that it is almost certainly a fictitious company :
The official website does not have any company registration number, license number or regulatory information;
The so-called "UK address" does not exist on the Companies House register;
There is no establishment date, director names, or actual controller of the company;
The promotional slogans are full of Ponzi scheme keywords such as "daily income" and "stable returns".
📌Conclusion : The background is completely opaque, and it is suspected that there is no registered entity operating, with the characteristics of a "shell platform".
II. Account and Transaction Conditions: Overpromises and Regulatory Red Lines
Dicestradex's account structure and conditions are full of doubts:
Account Type : No clear stratification is seen, and the spreads, leverage, and margin ratios for different accounts are not disclosed.
Minimum deposit : Some users report that it starts at 100 USDT;
Leverage level : Claimed to be as high as 1:1000, far exceeding the upper limits set by regulatory agencies such as the FCA and ASIC;
Profit promises : Some pages advertise "monthly returns up to 40%" and "AI strategies guarantee profits," which are extremely unreasonable.
Fees : The actual fee structure is not disclosed, and the spread data cannot be verified.
📉 Compared with compliant brokerages (such as IG, Saxo Bank, and OANDA), Dicestrade's information is almost completely opaque, especially promises such as "ultra-high leverage" and "fixed income", which are considered illegal financial inducement in the eyes of regulators.
3. Personal experience record (September 2025)
We conducted comprehensive testing from September 1 to September 19, 2025 to verify the authenticity of the platform and the security of funds:
🧩 Registration Process (September 1st)
Account opening requires only an email address and password, with no identity verification (KYC) required. This violates the anti-money laundering (AML) requirements of all major regulators and means the platform has no customer compliance review mechanism at all.
💳 Deposit Process (September 2nd)
A test deposit of 100 USDT was made, and the funds arrived within seconds. However, the amount displayed in the backend was "110 USDT". The extra "profit" was obviously fictitious data used to induce further increase in positions.
📊 Trading Experience (September 5th)
When trading on BTC/USD and EUR/USD pairs, the following anomalies were observed:
The quotes deviate by 30 to 80 points from mainstream markets such as Binance and Kraken;
The take-profit and stop-loss orders were not triggered, and there was a noticeable delay in the order;
The transaction price recorded in the background is inconsistent with the price displayed on the market page.
This indicates that the platform is most likely not connected to real market liquidity , but is using a "virtual backend" to falsify transaction data.
💸 Withdrawal Test (September 12)
When submitting a withdrawal request for 100 USDT, the system prompts "The account status is abnormal and a 20 USDT thawing fee must be paid first."
After paying, the money still did not arrive in my account. After applying again, I was asked to pay "15% tax".
In the end, no funds were received, the account balance was cleared, and customer service was completely lost.
📌Conclusion from personal testing : Withdrawal failed, funds were intercepted manually, and backend transaction data showed signs of falsification.
IV. Supervision and Compliance Verification: A Completely "Naked" Platform
| Regulatory agencies | Search results | Query results |
|---|---|---|
| FCA (UK) | No record | No company information related to Dicestradex was found |
| ASIC (Australia) | No record | The platform has not obtained an Australian financial services license |
| CySEC (Cyprus) | No record | No record |
| NFA (USA) | No record | Not registered as a retail forex broker or introducing broker |
Conclusion : This platform is not regulated by any financial regulatory body, leaving client funds completely unprotected. If the platform were to abscond, investors would have nowhere to defend their rights.
5. Domain Names and Transparency: Everything Points to a "Flash Scam"
Domain name registration time : newly registered in early 2025, with a very short operating history;
Registrant information : Using privacy protection services, the actual operator cannot be traced;
Website transparency : no team introduction, no compliance documents, and no third-party audit reports;
Filing records : No transaction data history, no news reports or media exposure.
⚠️Risk interpretation : Short-term domain name registration + anonymous entities + missing information are standard characteristics of fraudulent platforms that "shut down after a few scams."
6. User Complaints and Real Cases
Complaints about Dicestrade are common on various communities and investor rights platforms:
"I withdrew $200 and was asked to pay a $50 'clearing fee' first. After I paid, they said I had to pay taxes, and then I couldn't contact them anymore."
— From investor SL (September 2025)
“They said I could earn 20% per month. The first few withdrawals were fine, but after I invested a lot of money, they locked my funds and wouldn’t let me withdraw them.”
— Complainant Yuki (August 2025)
"The backend data is all fake. My friends and I have the same profit figures, which are not actual transactions at all."
—— Complainant AM (September 2025)
📌 These cases are completely consistent with what we have personally tested, proving that the platform's behavior is not an isolated case, but a systematic fraud pattern .
VII. Third-party and media evaluations
WikiFX : Labeled as a “high-risk platform” with a rating of only 1.2/10;
BrokerHiveX blacklist database : listed in the "unauthorized Ponzi scheme" category;
Investor forums : A large number of complaints about withdrawal obstructions, customer service disconnection, and backend fraud;
Twitter/Reddit : One user called it a "secondary scam group shell."
8. Comparison of Compliance Platforms
| project | Dicestradex | IG Group | OANDA | Saxo Bank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory license | ❌ None | ✅ FCA / ASIC | ✅ NFA / CFTC | ✅ FSA / FINMA |
| Client funds segregation | ❌ None | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| KYC/AML | ❌ None | ✅ Complete | ✅ Complete | ✅ Complete |
| Withdrawal review | ❌ Charges/Delays | ✅ Normal | ✅ Normal | ✅ Normal |
| transparency | ❌ Very Low | ✅ High | ✅ High | ✅ High |
📊 Conclusion: Dicestradex fails across the board in all key compliance dimensions.
IX. Multidimensional Risk Scoring (10-point scale)
| Dimensions | Fraction | Short comments |
|---|---|---|
| Platform transparency | 1/10 | Background, team, and audit are not disclosed |
| Regulatory compliance | 0/10 | No financial license |
| Investor Protection | 1/10 | No compensation fund, no segregated account |
| Actual experience | 1/10 | Withdrawal failed, backend fraud |
| User word of mouth | 1/10 | A large number of complaints and negative reviews |
| Risk control capabilities | 0/10 | No risk control documents or terms |
| Technical Verifiability | 2/10 | The system is closed and matching cannot be verified |
| International recognition | 1/10 | No media coverage, no partners |
| Platform reputation | 0/10 | Confirmed as the subject of fraud |
| Comprehensive score | 0.7 / 10 | Possesses all the characteristics of a typical fraud platform |
10. Conclusion: 100% scam platform, stay away from it
Dicestradex / dicestradex.com is a typical scam forex platform.
It lured investors into depositing funds by fabricating regulatory information and promising high returns. It then systematically plundered funds through backend manipulation, withdrawal denials, and secondary fees . Field tests and numerous user complaints point to the same conclusion: there are no real transactions on the platform, funds cannot be retrieved, and there is zero oversight or protection .
📉 Recommendations for investors:
Don’t deposit money , no matter how high the return is promised;
Those who have deposited funds should immediately preserve evidence and stop transferring funds ;
Report to regulatory authorities promptly and seek assistance from payment channels.
⚠️Risk Warning and Disclaimer
BrokerHivex is a financial media platform that displays information from the public internet or user-uploaded content. BrokerHivex does not support any trading platform or instrument. We are not responsible for any trading disputes or losses arising from the use of this information. Please note that the information displayed on the platform may be delayed, and users should independently verify its accuracy.

